KnowRevolution

The main thread of this entire site, at its core, is the importance of self awareness and the ability to think of yourself from outside yourself effectively enough to see if you are actually there. Through many discussions, I have found a lot of people don’t really understand that instead of being there, they aren’t anywhere. They are just a composite of everything they have experienced. Sure, that may be alot, but there is a difference between experiencing something and authoring the experience of your life.

With enough self awareness, one would eventually begin to distinguish between what they choose and what they were programmed to choose. This understanding would then lead them to question what and how they actually became what and who they are. And in that, there lies the core of what it means to be human- what is the nature of the thing that is so easily programmable that it can and does adapt to nearly any kind of environment. Thus, self awareness, when applied to its maximum potential, does the exact inverse of what it states itself to be. The more self aware one becomes, the more one can see oneself as a fluid being, both connected and disconnected simultaneously.

As awareness grows, one would at some point stumble across the realizations that they are not alone in a vacuum, but that they are surounded by others. This is where society and culture would come into the mix. And that pivotal point is about where most proclaimed self aware folks end their journey. Once they integrate, they are done. Kaput. Programmed. They have no concept of what could be being just as valid as what is, simply because they have only known what is.

But this is not about a bunch of random what-ifs. This is clear, precise lines being drawn to bring some consistency to the minds of those choosing to explore. Not so much for those that already have the answers. Still, we push on. Getting to the spot where one starts to look at themselves from a distance to see how and where they fit (or do not) into society is about where the journey for most ends. Then, when looking at that concept en masse, they watch and observe how people act over time and call that human nature. This cannot be further from objective reality any more so than calling a horse tied to a wagon a cow. When all you have seen is wagons and horses, but never a herd of mustangs across the valleys of South Dakota, all you know is what you have seen and what others have edified to the point where it becomes codified, and suddenly you are an expert at nothing other than confirmation bias and mass psychosis.

The idea of self awareness should bring you to the stripping away of the self to the point where you find your center. The inevitiable you. The inceptive ‘I’ that is, was, and will always be regardless of what happened to it. Once at that point, you may see why almost any observations of people are not dealing with their nature, but rather with their conditioning. The only thing natural to discuss would be the resistance or acceptance in terms of genetic predisposition to adaptations of external social stimulus. Period.

There are a lot of ways to notice what is missing. Not from the humans and their nature, but from what they tell you about what is missing by observing them in their free time where they have zero expectations. When the days work ends, they are not usually lining up for more rigirous systems to incorporate themselves into, but rather they, probably without knowing it, are silently screaming inside for some intuiutive stimulus and exercise where they can perhaps enjoy a moment and actually feel something. They hunt feelings in everything except the same shit they have already been doing all day. They gravitate subconsciously to the arts, not math. Places where they don’t know the answer yet. Stimulus where the ending is loosely unknown. Reaching out for areas where there is some risk of not knowing the conclusion before you begin; where certainty is slightly at risk.

Thus the intuitive side, the creative side kicks in to reconnect in the tiniest of hopeful moments that it won’t be completely forgotten. It reaches out for the kind of distractions that it most closely could have or would have resembled had the individual found a way to break away from the system that crushed it. Music, movies, shows, etc. All free form modes of play. But why? You never asked why…

To the idea of systems… In a world where the intuitive has been forced to undergo a figurative putting under, it lies there alive yet unable to move. And then the experts come in and talk of how humans would do such and such at whatever point because that is how humans are.

It’s funny. The previous thought is a thought of systems. In X system, humans do X. But when someone brings up something different, where X system was never around, hasn’t even been thought of because no one seems to talk about anything other than X, these same people claim that they know how humans would react in system Y because look at what they do in system X.

Not the same. And here is the point of it all… All things are systems. Cars, bicycles, group sports, relationships, the silverware cubby…. they are all systems. I didn’t see the experts flip out and discard the actual invention of the home air fryer when it hit the market. But, most people had never even heard of an air fryer before. Might have taken a few years for them to become commonly accepted, but holy crap, they did.

The home air fryer is just another system. So is the electically assisted bicycle. So is the home computer. So check yourself and see how your system is programmed. See if your system can handle new ideas. Human nature in part is the ability to take another systems programming so as to fit into an existing system. This has been exploited, but it is a major part of the nature of the human. So why is it that in any other area of life, humans acceot change so readily-even major changes- to the point where they will sit down and pontificate for hours on end about the possibilities of space travel, alternate timelines, etc. but if someone brings up the idea of humans moving themselves towards a free society in large numbers they suddenly can’t accept a thought because their programming kicks in and shuts it down? The ideas of new tech- they have no issue with. So why can’t they explore the possibility of societies working in some completely unknown ways with the same acceptance they have and are completely ok with when dealing with new tech?

Eveything becomes some kind of system. But to be human and be closer to your nature, or to better understand the power you have to create your own path comes with it the price of understanding just how programmed you already are. Check your systems. Are you adverse to something because YOU didn’t like it? Or because it is not popular? Keep in mind, if you were born a few decades or centuries plus or minus, you would have been programmed rather differently. But something therein to note would be some consistences on the external, and also gives reason as to why certain things don’t seem to change. Domination, for example. You can literally, if you dig deep enough, trace back certain very powerful families that control world events today to the days of Babylon and beyond. Huh? Wonder how those families have stayed on top of the dominance hierarchy on that particular board (you don’t HAVE to play it) for so long… How many generations of different faiths, systems of belief, and structures were indoctrinated into the humans to keep them disconnected from their natural selves? For just as indoctrination is most often external, every person has the ability to re-indoctrinate themselves with a program of their own. One that doesn’t bow to the useless Epstein class. One that doesn’t crave to be part of the herd for safety out of fear, but instead enjoys the social landscape of the herd for the immense benefits in efficiency and variety.

It is hard to co-opt a system from a people who run not on a unified server, but instead as a single node peer to peer complex. You cannot control what must be voluntarily accepted. And in that statement is the key to the whole program, and you will never unsee it. How do you get control of a system when acceptance must be voluntary? You have to indoctrinate. You have to condition the receiver to accept the tenets of slavery by indoctrinating them to believe it isn’t control.

Why do you have such a hard time with the idea of zero government? It is just another system. Why have they called thousands of years of humanity grinding away to keep an elite class (government) human nature when there is nothing humane nor natural about slavery and external indoctrination?

Check your systems. Complaining about the very pile of shit air fryer you cook with while simultaneously rejecting to talk about the plasma driven invector 3400 shallow fry inductive magnacook is ludicrous. But that is what you are programmed to do. Buy the next version of the same shit air fryer with a different label and same features just called something different.

Self awareness is supposed to be a path to external understandings.

Check your systems.